IWK recorded accumulated losses of RM888.81 million as of 2010, while RapidKL had incurred accumulated losses totalling RM293.82 million.
"Based on the audited financial statement, IWK recorded an increase in revenue amounting to RM156.03 million (27.5 percent increase) in 2009, but the revenue decreased in 2010 by RM105.34 million (a 14.6 percent drop).
"This was caused by a reduction in government subsidy and a reduction in revenue from charges for domestic and commercial sanitation services," the audit report states.
IWK in its reply to the Auditor-General's Department said the solution to overcome this was to raise the tariff for raw sewerage treatment relative to water usage, as outlined in its business plan in 2009.
Not fully compliant
The audit report also quoted a United Nations study stating that 96 percent of the population enjoyed access to sanitation services, with 93 percent of the population having "good" services.
A separate study by the Department of Environment between 2008 and 2011 showed that of the 844 plants tested, 6.3 percent did not fulfil the stipulated effluent standards.
In closing, the audit report suggested that, among others, the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry, Finance Ministry and the National Water Services Commission (Span) consider IWK's proposal to raise the tariff.
Finance Ministry Inc took full control of IWK in 2000. It controls all sanitation services in the country except in Sabah, Sarawak, Kelantan and Johor.
RapidKL seeks fare increase
As for RapidKL, the audit report noted that it recorded an accumulated loss of RM293.82 million as of 2010, while recording a profit of RM54.57 million in 2009.
In a reply to the audit team, RapidKL said the losses were the result of rising salaries for staff and maintenance costs, while fares had stagnated since 2005.
RapidKL added that it would be increasingly difficult to keep up with operational costs unless fares were raised in the near future, thus requiring more assistance from the federal government.
According to a chart on RapidKL's financial performance, there was a five-fold increase in administrative cost, from RM14.39 million in 2009 to RM75.07 million in 2010.
This particular issue was not discussed by the audit team.
Buses not fully utilised
The audit team also noted that in 2011, only 75.2 percent of RapidKL's 939-strong fleet was operational.
"The percentage of buses in operation is not 100 percent. Among others, this was caused by a lack of bus drivers.
"This can affect the level of bus services and passengers will need to wait longer in between buses," reads the report.
The audit found that there is no scheduled maintenance (of buses). Maintenance is only performed whenever needed.
The audit team warned that RapidKL runs a risk of lacking sufficient numbers of buses to stand in for buses that breakdown while servicing routes.
"RapidKL should improve its repair and maintenance process to ensure that the number of operational buses are increased," the report states.
No comments:
Post a Comment