Upon serious consideration, it decided to hold a public inquiry into the matter, Suhakam said in a statement today.
This is the same panel that conducted the Bersih 2.0 public inquiry.
“This decision takes into account Suhakam’s own monitoring of the event of April 28, and a number of other pertinent factors, including the submission of complaints, reports and memoranda from members of the public, human rights and professional groups, as well as civil society members to the commission relating to the matter, which all call for an independent inquiry.
'Suhakam can no longer wait'
“The commission had wanted to (wait for the independent panel), but can no longer await the release of the terms of reference of the independent panel established by the government as they have yet to be finalised,” it said.
Hanif said the terms may be out after Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein had been brief by the ministry.
Despite this, Suhakam said the commission was obliged to carry out its own public inquiry pursuant to its mandate as provided under the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999.
Suhakam also announced its terms of reference for the public inquiry:
- To determine whether there were any violations of the human rights of any person or part during and after the public assembly on April 28, 2012;
- If violations of human rights did occur, the panel will determine:
- How such violations came about;
- What administrative directives and procedures, or arrangements contributed to the
- violations; and
- Which person or agency was responsible for such violations; and
- Recommend measures to be taken to ensure that such violations do not recur.
Suhakam called on members of the public to submit evidence and information on allegations of, among others, the violence used by the authorities during and after the public assembly on April 28.
They have until noon on Monday June 4, 2012, to submit the documentation or evidence.
Suhakam's announcement today came in light of the announcements by the coalition for clean and fair elections Bersih and the Bar Council that they would boycott the panel headed by Hanif.
They have argued that the panel headed by Hanif does not have legal immunity to call witnesses and questioned Hanif's impartiality, especially after he said saw communist elements in the rally.
No comments:
Post a Comment