Last
Saturday's forum in Subang Jaya, on the topic 'Islamic state: Which
version? Whose responsibility?', was jointly organised by the Oriental
Hearts and Minds Study Institute and Islamic Renaissance Front.
At the forum, Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar had said that there was "no compulsion in religion" when responding to a question from a member of the audience on whether religious freedom also applied to Malays.
This was reported by Malaysiakini under the headline, 'Nurul: There should be no compulsion in choosing faith.'
Nurul Izzah had also said, in her reply to the question, that she was "tied to the prevailing views" in the country.
On Monday, Utusan Malaysia attacked Nurul Izzah for her comments at the forum in a report on its front page, and quoted the Malaysiakini report in the article headlined ‘Melayu perlu bebas pilih agama?' (Should Malays be free to choose religion?).
Subsequently, Nurul Izzah was accused of advocating apostasy among Muslims - a claim she has vehemently denied and has threatened law suits against both Utusan Malaysia and Berita Harian.
Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, who also stepped into the row through a Bernama report yesterday, questioned why the Lembah Pantai MP was suing the two dailies, but not Malaysiakini.
Here, Malaysiakini produces the transcript of the event, during the period Nurul Izzah responded to questions from the floor.
She took the questions ahead of other speakers because she had to leave early.
Question 1: It's heartening to know that you just cannot coerce someone into believing your beliefs, right? On any matter.
Now, I do want to ask a very controversial question, so what then the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community) here or the sexual minority here?
I'd like your views on that because there are people who feel that just by being able to love the same sex goes against their religion or beliefs, but we don't believe that.
Our own beliefs are such that we are answerable to God, yes, but let us be answerable to God. Thanks.
Moderator: YB Nurul can you... all right, we'll have one more, just one more question, then she'll answer both then take leave. Yes.
Question 2: I'm very happy to hear YB Nurul speak about freedom of religion. Does she actually apply that to Malays as well in terms of freedom of religion? That is number one.
Number two, I think it is a fallacy to believe that Egypt now is (in) a better condition than it was before. Everybody knows that it is getting worse.
I have a friend in Egypt and she is really not happy about what is going on over there, so I do believe YB is trying to promote the idea of an Islamic state, like you know this which is completely not true.
But mainly my question is, when you speak of freedom of religion, are you actually applying to the Malays as well? Thanks.
Moderator: Well YB Nurul, that's a good way to start the morning.
The audience laughs.
Moderator: You have two questions of great import at two ends of the spectrum. Could you try to answer that, please.
Nurul Izzah: Thank you, Cyrus, I love too.
The audience laughs.
Nurul Izzah: Okay, so the first question. In terms of the sexual rights of LGBT, Tariq Ramadan addressed this question when IRF organised his programme, I think about three months back and I think, of course, you're not just talking about Islam.
There are limitations and you know, implemented in Christianity with regards to people of - you know - LGBT, but one thing is important is you should not victimise anyone.
You should not also implement and you know, ensure the laws of the land encroach into private... uh.. into public space.
I think that is the main underlying principle. But if you ask me whether, as a Muslim, I can accept, I think yes, you or whoever that, besides their particular sexual orientation.
Yes, in private you cannot enforce them certain regulation, etcetera. But as a Muslim, I also cannot accept and that is regulation of my faith and as well as my friends who are Catholic, etcetera.
I think here you want to make sure that they are not victimised, the current practise, whether how, through the Borders (bookstore) ... sort of, err, how Jawi or Jakim at that time went to the Borders, some books etcetera, so the way it is practised does not respect and does not give any meaning for the sanctity of Islam, or any religion for that matter.
You must always use hikmah, so yes, I will say here, we have limitation, but certainly it should not be encroached into public space.
The second question with regards (to) what you think I'm trying to promote, I would correct that assumption. Yes, Egypt is undergoing a tumultuous process. It has not been resolved, there are many challenges they face.
I am not saying they have achieved a Utopian ideal view of a state and how it should be governed but I always take the development of the Muslim Brotherhood, in particular, from seen as a rather dogmatic Islamic movement come up with a political entity to meet the needs of the time and their relationship and collaboration with the Christian Coptic is something in particular that we have to observe and appreciate.
So if you say things are bad for Egypt, no. You, and we, must not be so judgmental and that is partly the society or the country that we have inherited that allows us to see things in black and white, whereas sometimes it is not as simple as that.
Sometimes in a stormy period, it is important for them to undergo and hopefully, because we wish for the best. We wish that they will have wisdom and finally manage the governance of the country itself.
But...
The bell rings.
Moderator: Okay, one more minute.
The audience laughs.
Nurul Izzah: Yes, umm, but the idea itself, I think, goes back. And when you ask me, there is no compulsion in religion, even Dr (Ahmad) Farouk (Musa) quoted that verse in the Quran.
How can you ask me or anyone, how can anyone really say, 'Sorry, this only apply to non-Malays.' It has to apply equally... apply equally.
The audience applauds.
Nurul Izzah: In the Quran, there is no specific terms for the Malays. This is how it should be done. So I am tied, of course, to the prevailing views but I would say that.
So what you want is of course in terms of quality. You believe so strongly in your faith, that even me, being schooled in Assunta with a huge cross in the hall and an active singing Catholic society will not deter you.
The bell rings and the moderator thanks the speaker.
The audience applauds as Nurul Izzah leaves the hall.
At the forum, Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar had said that there was "no compulsion in religion" when responding to a question from a member of the audience on whether religious freedom also applied to Malays.
This was reported by Malaysiakini under the headline, 'Nurul: There should be no compulsion in choosing faith.'
Nurul Izzah had also said, in her reply to the question, that she was "tied to the prevailing views" in the country.
On Monday, Utusan Malaysia attacked Nurul Izzah for her comments at the forum in a report on its front page, and quoted the Malaysiakini report in the article headlined ‘Melayu perlu bebas pilih agama?' (Should Malays be free to choose religion?).
Subsequently, Nurul Izzah was accused of advocating apostasy among Muslims - a claim she has vehemently denied and has threatened law suits against both Utusan Malaysia and Berita Harian.
Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, who also stepped into the row through a Bernama report yesterday, questioned why the Lembah Pantai MP was suing the two dailies, but not Malaysiakini.
Here, Malaysiakini produces the transcript of the event, during the period Nurul Izzah responded to questions from the floor.
She took the questions ahead of other speakers because she had to leave early.
Question 1: It's heartening to know that you just cannot coerce someone into believing your beliefs, right? On any matter.
Now, I do want to ask a very controversial question, so what then the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community) here or the sexual minority here?
I'd like your views on that because there are people who feel that just by being able to love the same sex goes against their religion or beliefs, but we don't believe that.
Our own beliefs are such that we are answerable to God, yes, but let us be answerable to God. Thanks.
Moderator: YB Nurul can you... all right, we'll have one more, just one more question, then she'll answer both then take leave. Yes.
Question 2: I'm very happy to hear YB Nurul speak about freedom of religion. Does she actually apply that to Malays as well in terms of freedom of religion? That is number one.
Number two, I think it is a fallacy to believe that Egypt now is (in) a better condition than it was before. Everybody knows that it is getting worse.
I have a friend in Egypt and she is really not happy about what is going on over there, so I do believe YB is trying to promote the idea of an Islamic state, like you know this which is completely not true.
But mainly my question is, when you speak of freedom of religion, are you actually applying to the Malays as well? Thanks.
Moderator: Well YB Nurul, that's a good way to start the morning.
The audience laughs.
Moderator: You have two questions of great import at two ends of the spectrum. Could you try to answer that, please.
Nurul Izzah: Thank you, Cyrus, I love too.
The audience laughs.
Nurul Izzah: Okay, so the first question. In terms of the sexual rights of LGBT, Tariq Ramadan addressed this question when IRF organised his programme, I think about three months back and I think, of course, you're not just talking about Islam.
There are limitations and you know, implemented in Christianity with regards to people of - you know - LGBT, but one thing is important is you should not victimise anyone.
You should not also implement and you know, ensure the laws of the land encroach into private... uh.. into public space.
I think that is the main underlying principle. But if you ask me whether, as a Muslim, I can accept, I think yes, you or whoever that, besides their particular sexual orientation.
Yes, in private you cannot enforce them certain regulation, etcetera. But as a Muslim, I also cannot accept and that is regulation of my faith and as well as my friends who are Catholic, etcetera.
I think here you want to make sure that they are not victimised, the current practise, whether how, through the Borders (bookstore) ... sort of, err, how Jawi or Jakim at that time went to the Borders, some books etcetera, so the way it is practised does not respect and does not give any meaning for the sanctity of Islam, or any religion for that matter.
You must always use hikmah, so yes, I will say here, we have limitation, but certainly it should not be encroached into public space.
The second question with regards (to) what you think I'm trying to promote, I would correct that assumption. Yes, Egypt is undergoing a tumultuous process. It has not been resolved, there are many challenges they face.
I am not saying they have achieved a Utopian ideal view of a state and how it should be governed but I always take the development of the Muslim Brotherhood, in particular, from seen as a rather dogmatic Islamic movement come up with a political entity to meet the needs of the time and their relationship and collaboration with the Christian Coptic is something in particular that we have to observe and appreciate.
So if you say things are bad for Egypt, no. You, and we, must not be so judgmental and that is partly the society or the country that we have inherited that allows us to see things in black and white, whereas sometimes it is not as simple as that.
Sometimes in a stormy period, it is important for them to undergo and hopefully, because we wish for the best. We wish that they will have wisdom and finally manage the governance of the country itself.
But...
The bell rings.
Moderator: Okay, one more minute.
The audience laughs.
Nurul Izzah: Yes, umm, but the idea itself, I think, goes back. And when you ask me, there is no compulsion in religion, even Dr (Ahmad) Farouk (Musa) quoted that verse in the Quran.
How can you ask me or anyone, how can anyone really say, 'Sorry, this only apply to non-Malays.' It has to apply equally... apply equally.
The audience applauds.
Nurul Izzah: In the Quran, there is no specific terms for the Malays. This is how it should be done. So I am tied, of course, to the prevailing views but I would say that.
So what you want is of course in terms of quality. You believe so strongly in your faith, that even me, being schooled in Assunta with a huge cross in the hall and an active singing Catholic society will not deter you.
The bell rings and the moderator thanks the speaker.
The audience applauds as Nurul Izzah leaves the hall.
Seriously? That's all she said? Very carefully worded answer intended NOT to invite criticism but Utusan plays is up like that? Such a mountain out of a mole hill. But I guess they've been trying to dig some dirt on Nurul and they finally got something.
ReplyDeleteOn the other hand, Utusan has done me a great favour. I hadn't heard of this blog before. But thanks to Utusan's storm in a teacup, and Malaysia Today publishing this article, Ive landed here. For what it's worth, they are inadvertedly uniting the people against them.
Farouq Omaro says: great blog, thanks
ReplyDeleteUtusan sakit jiwa.......
ReplyDeleteWow this is good. If there is no compulsion even for the Malays does it now means that those currently practising Islam can leave the faith for some personal reasons?
ReplyDeleteThe method of distortion visited upon Nurul Izzah by certain medias disgusts me.
ReplyDeleteIt makes me emotionally weak and sick, to an indescribable extent.
Today I am ashamed. Today, I am ashamed to be a Malaysian.
Poor you. I hope you are not ashamed of being a Malay and Muslim. Anyway she has opened the floodgate in case you change your mind.
DeleteIt has to apply equally... apply equally.
Deletewhat that does that really means Nurul?
Anonymous9 November 2012 11:45 : There was no distortion by any media. If you try to understand the question posted in the forum and the reply NI gave and relate it to the actual spirit and interpretations of the verse by renowned scholars you can see that she had misquoted (probably unknowingly she was "drawn" into giving such an answer). True the Koran did not mention "Malays" but she did, causing all the uproar as, on the surface or to those who do not know the true meaning of the verse or to those who are not Moslems, her statement indirectly implies that Moslem Malays can become infidels.
DeleteI can see her means...and i believe what she had quote is true....Islam need quality not quantity..Your faith is judge by GOD...if you strong enough and you believe that GOD is in your heart...You will stay MOSLEM...it just like the chinesse say ...Temple in your heart...She is not encourage people to convert, she is answering the faith of the questioner...
ReplyDeleteThere is no compulsion. You can't force faith. If you believe, you are. If you don't, you are not. Whatever label you might carry.
Deletemohd ilham ... really?
DeleteMeaning if I am a Moslem and I no longer have faith in Islam or the quality of my faith is shrinking I can now convert to another religion?
ReplyDeleteAsk Nurul Izah again lor...
Deletedo you really have to be so intellectually challenge? or if you have a problem in understanding that words, then I'll use another word for you..are you stupid?
Deletewhen it is come to faith and religion, people don't simply decide about converting to one. Ones has to do a very detailed research and ask/doubt a lot before going into one, it take years, it takes so much effort, to have a strong faith in one. And then the registration come..THEN you really really start practicing regularly.
Thats the proper way when it comes to converting..it's like marriage but even more committed.
If you are a believer on a religion, which then becoming faithless and then you feel like changing your religion..then you should ask yourself a lot of question. TO YOURSELF! not asking Nurul Izzah..
I have no problem with Nurul Izzah, I think she's doing the best she can to make people think critically.
So, this is not about her, or anyone else. Its about you.
1. Is that what you want and believe that you want?
2. Why did you embrace Islam in the first place?
3. 'No longer have faith in Islam'..does it mean you don't believe in Allah, Nabi Muhammad..and all the teaching?
4. If you don't believe in Islam, in Allah, what do you believe in now?
5. Can you committed to the next religion better than the one you had now?
It's not about telling people to be murtad or muallaf. It's about you need to know why you belief in certain religion, and if you in it then get to know about it. Islam need more faithful and educated muslim, believers. People who belief in why they belief. Not those who are scared and munafik. Yet, if you are a munafik, the door of forgiveness is still widely open for you till the end of your life.
Please, dearest all Anonymous..stop posting stupid questions about how to DEAL with something, when you yourself should actually think.
Islam itself has its own rules in dealing with this matter. for a muslim to convert to another religion is "Murtad" and carry's severe penalty if one does not repent.
ReplyDeleteHow can that be? Thot Nurul said there's no compulsion and the laws shud be changed?
DeleteThat's why we condemned Nurul Izzah's statement.
ReplyDeleteFrom her statement this kind of question coming in:
Meaning if I am a Moslem and I no longer have faith in Islam or the quality of my faith is shrinking I can now convert to another religion?
She can't be wrong, can she? After all she is also a practicing Moslem and definitely she knows what she's talking about. And no religious leaders have condemned her statement.
DeleteAnybody can be wrong actually. I do make a mistake too. Indeed she's practicing Muslim. I concur on your statement. But an interpretation from Quranic verses, by not referring to Tafseer Scholars we tend to make mistake.
DeleteBy the way, I respect on your reply tone. It does soften the heart.
Anonymous 10 November 2012 07:23--> Nik Abdul Abduh (Nik Aziz's son) and Datuk Dr Mahfodz Mohamed both of PAS have given their statements...Nurul Izzah had misinterpreted the verse. So you stay put.
DeleteIf a Muslim Malay say something that make people ask uneducated question as such, it's wrong????
DeleteIf someone ask, you answer. Not blaming the ones before who make the question comes out. That attitude of trying to make people to be not aware and defensive, suppressing their thoughts, being ignorant is the cause of weaknesses in man's faith.
Nurul Izzah clearly trying to put it out there that people shouldn't put Malay as the race above other races in Malaysia. We are not a Malay nation. Islamic countries? I hope that we are. Our leaders has their ID showing that they're religion is Islam.
Her statement is a reaction toward what is happening in Malaysia. Isu murtad is not something new, but quite a taboo. People don't talk about it and they hope it go away by creating laws and punishments. When actually this is a symptom that need to be analyses and solve. The situations show that people here in our part of the world are getting faithless. Why do they become faithless? why don't you ask that?
Why are people becoming faithless? Is it good for them and the next generation to come? If it is bad, why? How do we make people belief again?
Questions should rise;
What did we do wrong that make things turn out this way? Have we been falsely educated the young generation in thinking that if they are in certain religion, if they look like they are practicing one (appearance) then it's ok. If they want to know more, they need to ask people about it, while actually we should question them more about their believe so they will know why they belief what they belief.
And guide them so that they don't get astray. But everyone is so busy in looking at people's false, not looking at themselves..
IS MUSLIM BECOME A MUSLIM BECAUSE LAW MAKE THEM THAT WAY AND THEY ARE TOO SCARED TO DISOBEY?
So there, questions..
question that come after your statements.
Should your statements be condemned too?
I believe that a muslim need to be educated, by themselves and by others, from religion knowledge to history, science, thinking skills. But mostly, they need to know why they still believe in Islam even when they are so many condemnation out there regarding Islam. Not because 'we were born this way', not because 'it is what it is'. NOT BECAUSE THE LAW SAID SO.
Sorry remarks meant for Anonymous 9 November 2012 16:10
ReplyDeleteThere is no compulsion in Islam and this includes the Muslims. Contrary to common perception, the Noble Quran was sent down not only for the Muslims but to all mankind through Prophet Muhammad PBUH and therefore its commandments apply to all.
ReplyDeleteMuslims who left Islam for another faith are not true Muslims to begin with. A TRUE Muslim will never leave Islam, even by force. A true Muslim is someone who clearly understood the true path as set by Allah through all His messengers (Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, may peace be upon all of them), not because he was a Muslim by birth. It is the duty of Muslims to establish the proof of Islam to the people so that truth can be made clear from falsehood. Noble Quran 2:256 clearly states ‘There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong. So whoever disbelieves in Taghut (idols, Satan worshipping, etc) and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold with no break in it. And Allah is Hearing and Knowing.’ Again, in the Noble Quran 6:153, God clearly states “And, [moreover], this is My path, which is straight, so follow it; and do not follow [other] ways, for you will be separated from His way. This has He instructed you that you may become righteous.”
The duty of a true Muslim beside total submission to Allah and following His commandments, is to emulate the Prophet that is to convey God’s message. Noble Quran 64:12 clearly states ‘And obey ALLAH and obey the Messenger. But if you turn away (do not accept Islam), then Our Messenger is responsible only for conveying the Message clearly.’
If the Prophet, in this context, is responsible only to convey the Message clearly, who are we to force others (including exMuslims) to accept Islam? Its the duty of every true Muslims to clearly explain the message of Allah (via the Noble Quran) but if that someone still will not accept Islam, then indeed ‘....God leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases: and He is Exalted in power, full of Wisdom.’ Noble Quran 14:4.
Other verses from the Noble Quran which indicate no compulsion in Islam include :
“If it had been your Lord’s will, all of the people on Earth would have believed. Would you then compel the people so to have them believe?” Noble Quran 10:99
“So if they dispute with you, say ‘I have submitted my whole self to God, and so have those who follow me.’ And say to the People of the Scripture and to the unlearned: ‘Do you also submit yourselves?’ If they do, then they are on right guidance. But if they turn away, your duty is only to convey the Message. And in God’s sight are all of His servants.” Noble Quran 3:20
This is the best comment. Supported by the quran itself.
DeleteBut I think those ayats have been abrogated by the ayat that commands the muslim to kill the apostates.
Also, 2:256 also been abrogated by 9:29. Look at what the califs did to Egypt, Palestine, and Syria. These 3 nations were actually major centers of primitive Christianity and of the Roman Empire..
Sorry if I am misquoting the quran..
And all this debate amongst g yourselves can only be done on this Christian blog/page ..... truly interesting !
ReplyDeleteI agree Anonymous.. Haishhh...whatever.. As long as i live happily in Msia, dont touch my religion...shoooh!
Delete