The Selangor government managed to acquire 13 parcels of land from
Talam Corporation Bhd at a RM9.1 million discount as part of a debt
restructuring deal, contrary to claims by MCA that the move was a
bailout.
This was based on the difference in a private firm’s
valuation of the land, amounting to RM685 million, against the state’s
valuation of RM676 million.
At a press conference today, DAP publicity chief Tony Pua said this information was in Talam’s circular to shareholders on March 15, 2011.
“Instead
of criticising the Selangor government, MCA should be praising (Menteri
Besar) Khalid Ibrahim for his astute business sense,” said Pua, who is
also Petaling Jaya Utara MP.
Pua said that the circular was
available on the freely available Bursa Malaysia website, suggesting
that MCA did not do adequate homework.
The private property valuation firm used by Talam is Mitra Valuers & Property Consultants Sdn Bhd.
Although
the integrity of property valuation’s can be questioned, Pua said that
the state makes its assessments with help from the Valuation and
Property Services Department, under the federal government’s Finance
Ministry.
On Monday, MCA central committee member Chua Tee Yong alleged that the state government had bailed out Talam with RM266 million of public funds.
‘Look at the numbers’
Chua,
a trained accountant, claimed that instead of paying its decade-old
debt of RM392 million owed to several state agencies, the company had
made a handsome gain.
“They say they collected money from Talam, but from what I see it is Talam getting the cash,” said Chua, who had initially claimed that the bailout involved RM1 billion.
It was later established that the RM266 million was actually liabilities to the bank, which the state government had to shoulder as the new landowners.
Following this, Chua had zeroed in
on his complaint to just one parcel of land in Bestari Jaya, which he
claimed the state government had “overpaid” by RM41 million.
Again
referring to the Talam’s circular to shareholders, Pua conceded that
this appear to be the case because the firm’s valuation was RM139
million as opposed to the state’s of RM181 million.
Although he
is unable to explain this anomaly, Pua said that for the purpose of the
debt restructuring exercise, the total valuation for all 13 properties
surrendered by Talam should be taken into consideration.
However,
in the case of Bestari Jaya, Pua agreed that the market value for the
land appeared to be higher than the state’s valuation.
BN gave discounts, we didn’t
He
showed reporters an offer letter to the state government to purchase
the land at RM90,000 per acre, which is more than the state's valuation
of RM80,000 per acre.
“The best judge of market valuation is what
people are willing to pay for... It is a good deal, because state has
undervalued the land. It is worth more than what we ‘paid’ for,” he
said.
The full offer letter, dated November 2011 and prepared by lawyers, was sighted by Malaysiakini.
Pua made the document available to the press with certain names redacted.
In
summary, Pua said that the state government did not look into
individual parcels of land and was only interested in all 13 plots.
“A
bailout is when you gain. In this case, Talam lost RM392 million. What
is important is... that (assets) is with the state government. The
people did not have to pay.
“Before 2008, Talam was never made to pay the state. After we found out about the debt, Talam was made to pay,” he said.
On the contrary, Pua pointed out that the previous BN administration had given huge discounts to its cronies engaged in land deals, as pointed out by Sekinchan state assemblyperson Ng Suee Lim.
No comments:
Post a Comment