The Public Accounts Committee’s (PAC) silence on its probes in major
controversies involving almost RM9 billion of government funds, has
raised suspicions that there are “cover-up” orders in place, said
opposition parliamentarians.
They
said today that PAC had deferred meetings for the last three months
although it has yet to delve into, among others, the highly secretive
out-of-court settlement between former Malaysia Airlines boss Tajudin
Ramli (right) and Pengurusan Danaharta Bhd and the doubled costs of the new permanent low-cost carrier terminal in Sepang (KLIA2).
Although
the powerful parliamentary committee had reached a consensus on
investigating these cases last year, it had also merely touched the
surface on its probes into the alleged misappropriation of the RM250
million loan given to National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) cattle project
and 1Malaysia Development Bhd’s ‘dubious’ investment in PetroSaudi
International, said Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua during a press
conference at the Parliament lobby.
Pua recalled that when the
PAC was probing the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) scandal, meetings were
called “almost every week, even when Parliament was not in session”.
Tumpat PAS MP Kamaruddin Jaafar (left)
added that the PAC has not even got to the bottom of the past
expenditures and the government has already tabled an additional
expenditure of RM13.7 billion for this year’s budget.
PAC deputy
chairperson Tan Seng Giaw, who is also the Kepong DAP MP, said they had
written to panel chief Azmi Khalid today, reminding him that the
committee had agreed on March 5 to haul up the civil servants and
government-linked companies to discuss the four issues.
“We are
very disappointed as no meetings were called to discuss the issues even
after three months. Moreover, the PAC did not even receive the official
documents requested from 1MDB,” said the letter signed by the opposition
members.
They had raised similar concerns in April when Dewan
Rakyat speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia “advised” against PAC continuing its
inquiry into cases that are in court, including NFC and other suits
linked to Tajudin.
BN parliamentarians, including de facto Law
Minister Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz, are also opposed to having the two
issues discussed further, saying this could amount to being sub-judice.
However,
the Pakatan MPs had reiterated that PAC's probe into issues will not be
not “sub-judice”, as the committee would only question government
agencies on the disbursement of funds.
No comments:
Post a Comment