Young
netizens have expressed concern over the amendment to the Evidence
Act, especially by the prospect of innocent users being falsely charged.
Several students interviewed by Malaysiakini, though not familiar with the exact details of the change , nevertheless were appalled at discovering what they entailed.
According to the Evidence (Amendment) (No2) Act 2012, the owner of a website, internet connection or equipment with which the posting is made, is presumed to be the person who made the posting unless proven otherwise.
Gabriel Clement Chua, a 22-year-old student from Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), said he was shocked and worried when he first read about the amendment.
"It is especially unfair for those of us who use social networking accounts like Facebook, because you can't control the words of other individuals.
"Even though cybercrimes should be prevented, not all internet users should be presumed guilty," he said.
Mavin Jothy, 21, (left) said he understands the desire of the government to curb cybercrimes.
"Thousands of irresponsible and offensive comments are made daily, and no one is held accountable," he said.
However, Mavin insisted individuals should not be held responsible for comments made by other users on their site.
"The Internet is meant to be an environment of free expression, but now we'll have to be cautious and watch our backs," noted the law student from Taylor's University.
Amar Hidayat, 21, agreed that the amendment is "completely absurd".
"Websites can be hacked, and even though I am very careful with my computer, some innocent individuals could get in trouble," he said.
Amar, (right) who is also a law student at Taylor's University, added that the amendment could discourage restaurants and cafes from providing free internet coverage.
Some lean towards curb
However, not all students were against the Evidence Act amendment.
Syarifah Zueihan, 22, said the amendment is fair because website owners should be able to control what is published.
"If these individuals are not held responsible, then who else will be?" she asked.
Syarifah, who is majoring in English Literature at UPM, added that people should be careful with their website security to ensure their accounts are not hacked or impersonated.
The amendment to the Evidence Act was passed by the Dewan Negara in May, and has been criticized by various individuals and NGOs.
This includes an online petition by the Centre for Independent Journalism calling for the government to withdraw the amendment, which has obtained nearly 3,000 signatures.
Several students interviewed by Malaysiakini, though not familiar with the exact details of the change , nevertheless were appalled at discovering what they entailed.
According to the Evidence (Amendment) (No2) Act 2012, the owner of a website, internet connection or equipment with which the posting is made, is presumed to be the person who made the posting unless proven otherwise.
Gabriel Clement Chua, a 22-year-old student from Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), said he was shocked and worried when he first read about the amendment.
"It is especially unfair for those of us who use social networking accounts like Facebook, because you can't control the words of other individuals.
"Even though cybercrimes should be prevented, not all internet users should be presumed guilty," he said.
'Completely absurd amendment'
Mavin Jothy, 21, (left) said he understands the desire of the government to curb cybercrimes.
"Thousands of irresponsible and offensive comments are made daily, and no one is held accountable," he said.
However, Mavin insisted individuals should not be held responsible for comments made by other users on their site.
"The Internet is meant to be an environment of free expression, but now we'll have to be cautious and watch our backs," noted the law student from Taylor's University.
Amar Hidayat, 21, agreed that the amendment is "completely absurd".
"Websites can be hacked, and even though I am very careful with my computer, some innocent individuals could get in trouble," he said.
Amar, (right) who is also a law student at Taylor's University, added that the amendment could discourage restaurants and cafes from providing free internet coverage.
Some lean towards curb
However, not all students were against the Evidence Act amendment.
Syarifah Zueihan, 22, said the amendment is fair because website owners should be able to control what is published.
"If these individuals are not held responsible, then who else will be?" she asked.
Syarifah, who is majoring in English Literature at UPM, added that people should be careful with their website security to ensure their accounts are not hacked or impersonated.
The amendment to the Evidence Act was passed by the Dewan Negara in May, and has been criticized by various individuals and NGOs.
This includes an online petition by the Centre for Independent Journalism calling for the government to withdraw the amendment, which has obtained nearly 3,000 signatures.
even the government websites also got hacked by anonymous. so how much of security precaution is needed for ordinary people?
ReplyDeletesign the petition: www.tinyurl.com/stop114a
find out more: www.tinyurl.com/stop114afaq
watch, embed, share: www.tinyurl.com/stop114avideo
make it known: #stop114a
strip show: http://stripgenerator.com/strip/660764/youre-already-guilty/
- siew eng
Saudara-saudara dan Saudari-saudari Yang Di Hormati
ReplyDeleteBahawa MCA Gombak pegurusi YIP KUM FOOK dan anaknya Yip Jiun Hann (Permuda MCA Gombak) bukan sahaja menggunakan kuasanya menghisap wang KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Tetapi lebih dahsyat, ialah menipu wanita-wanita dan merosakan keluarga orang lain. Mereka sebenar-benarnya orang yang jahat dan tak bermoral
Saya mengemukakan kesal yang benar ini, tujuan ialah harap orang ramai, khasnya wanita dapat mengambil perhatian supaya jangan terjerat oleh manis-manis mulutnya akhir akan meninpa kerugian dan kesakitan yang besar
马华公会鹅唛區会主席叶金福律师与马华公会鹅唛區会叶君瀚青年圑長, 不但无耻的利用KUIL BUDDHA SAMNAK SAMBODHI(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.宗教之名捞取权和私利之外, 叧一大罪悪是, 他们仗着权势, 甜言蜜語, 誘骗良家少女, 骗财骗色, 三妻四妾, 破坏别人的家庭. 父子两人, 无悪不做, 实是大色狼, 大老千,缺德的败娄.
今天我把实事公告大家, 是希望公众, 特别是良家少女, 要多多小心, 提防这一娄假面具的佛教徒, 以免一失足成千古恨.
Brother And Sister Of the respectfully
That YIP KUM FOOK, MCA Gombak chairman and his son Yip Jiun Hann (Youth MCA Gombak) they are not only used of power to suck Temple’s money of SAMNAK SAMBODHI BUDDHIST TEMPLE(Thai) No: 19 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. But far worse, they are cheating women and make people family broken. They truly wicked and immoral
Bring forward. I regret that this is true, the purpose is to hope for public, and especially women take care not to be trapped by the end of sweet mouth will override of great loss and pain