The
cancellation, over how much to charge for the dam's power, leaves both
the Malaysian government and the state government in Sarawak stumbling
around with vast amounts of generated power and nothing to use it for.Negotiations had been under way since 2007 for the construction of the smelter. In a prepared news release, Rio Tinto Alcan chief executive officer Jacynthe Côté said that "while a great deal of progress was made in negotiations with Sarawak Energy Berhad, agreement on a long- term competitive power supply contract could not be reached."
"We have built solid relationships with the government and our stakeholders in Sarawak and more broadly in Malaysia and we thank them for their support. Looking into the future, we remain interested in development opportunities that may arise within the state and the country," Côté said.
The decision by the Australia-based mining company to pull out is the latest blow in a saga that has gone on since the early 1980s, over a facility that Transparency International has called a "monument to corruption".
The
dam, said to be the largest rock-and-gravel filled dam on earth, blocks
the upper reaches of the Rajang River, standing as a white elephant on a
global scale.The common wisdom is that it was developed so that Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud could use it as an excuse to log the 23,000 hectares of virgin rainforest in the dam catchment area and deliver the timber into the hands of timber barons.
The Sarawak government is said to be planning another half-dozen dams to create even more unusable power. Environmentalists say the only reason for the dams is to provide an excuse to log off the watershed.
Spend money like water
As there was no competitive bidding for the RM15 billion contract to build the dam in the first place, there was no competitive bidding over the plan to build the smelter.
Cahya
Mata Sarawak (CMS), a company connected to the Taib famly and which
owns 40 percent of the Sarawak Aluminium Company (Salco) smelter
development, announced the termination in late March in a filing with
the Malaysian stock exchange, to the jubilation of environmentalists."There is no market for the power," Ame Trandem, the regional head of the International Rivers NGO, told Asia Sentinel. "They have resettled 10,000 people, it has had a devastating impact on the area and the people who live there. There is no market for the electricity."
Former prime minister Ahmad Abdullah Badawi tried to cancel the project when he followed Mahathir into office, but was unable to do so, part of the eternal enmity he earned from Mahathir, who worked tirelessly to drive him from office.
When Abdullah came to power in 2003 as Malaysia's prime minister, he told delegates to the 57th Umno general assembly that he would turn away from Mahathir's economic strategies. "That era is over," he told the delegates. It was soon Abdullah's era that was over.
Barry Wain's definitive history of Mahathir's political career, ‘Malaysian Maverick: Mahathir Mohamad in Turbulent Times',
estimated that Mahathir may well have wasted or burned up as much as
RM100 billion (US$40 billion at earlier exchange rates when the projects
were active) on grandiose projects and the corruption that the projects
engendered as he sought to turn Malaysia into an industrialised state.That includes the ill-fated Perwaja Steel project, which is estimated to have lost US$800 million before it was shut down; the Proton national car, which continues to bleed money, and many more.
In addition to allegedly serving as a forest plantation for Taib, the dam itself was part of a grandiose plan to meet electricity demand in peninsular Malaysia, nearly 700km away, via a high voltage direct current cable, since the entire island of Borneo, where the dam is situated, including the Indonesian state of Kalimantan, is unlikely to be able to use the amount of electricity it was projected to produce in the foreseeable future.
In
addition to the 700km of underwater conduit, an additional 300km line
was also envisioned to feed the power throughout peninsular Malaysia.
Because of the distance of transmission, the underwater cables would
have leaked more than half of the wattage before the power reached
peninsular Malaysia.At one point, the operation was projected to tie up the world's entire cable-laying capability. No cable, however, has ever been laid and the power remains sequestered in Sarawak.
Excessive power
Even without Bakun, Sarawak's installed electricity reserve capacity was estimated at 25 percent in 2005 and it hasn't changed much since.
Approved by Mahathir after 14 years of off-and-on again studies, ridiculed by economists and environmentalists, the dam was halted repeatedly when companies connected with it went broke.
The Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998, for instance, brought the dam project to a halt and forced the government to assume control from the consortium at an estimated cost of RM1.6 billion to Malaysian taxpayers.
It was revived in 2000 through a wholly owned-government company, Sarawak Hidro, along with the Malaysia-China Hydro JV consortium.
This
also isn‘t Bakun's first flirtation with an aluminum smelter. One was
previously proposed for Similajau, to be funded by the international
financier Mohamed Ali Alabbar as a joint venture between Dubai Aluminum
Co Ltd and Gulf International Investment Group.Those plans collapsed due to construction delays and squabbles over contractual terms. By 2004, most of the minor partners to the consortium posted losses or substantially decreased profits.
Taib Mahmud himself has faced numerous corruption allegations by critics over his 30-year career as chief minister, most recently when the Sarawak Report website linked his family to billions of dollars of properties in the United States, Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and Malaysia.
- Asia Sentinel
No comments:
Post a Comment